Mac Vs PC For Heavy Multitasking: Which One’s Better?
For many years, computing enthusiasts have argued over which offering is better: Apple’s Mac computers, or trusty ol’ Windows by Microsoft, which will run on basically anything. This argument hasn’t come to a conclusion for many years, shifting tune with the change of the market itself. However, times today present a very different environment for Apple and Microsoft users. Connected computing, synchronisation and continuous experiences have become the order of the day. There exists one demographic that Apple has continually been targeting since the late ’90s. This a revenue-rich demographic, and has only experienced growth in the time since Apple has been marketing to them. These are ‘professionals’, or what the Windows community would call power users. They require a lot of computing power, be it for tasks such as video editing or photo editing, to 3D animation and modelling. Apple has been producing ‘Pro’ moniker devices for a long time now, and these models feature a lot more power than the non-Pro ones. Before purchasing a computer, the user must first look at the kind of workload they are going to be engaging in. This focus has led to many professionals debating whether they should Macs or PCs for editing. This article will narrow down the choice and make it easier for companies, along with settling the argument on PC vs Mac. Mac: The Closed Garden Of Comfort And Usability Currently, Macs with the ‘Pro’ moniker come with a setup suitable for high-end professionals.  The product’s pricing begins at $5,000, a steep price for a computer released at the end of 2017. The low-end specification is suitable for lighter workloads such as intensive web browsing, rendering and editing photos and videos. However, the higher end models offer more powerful setups with a price to match. For the purposes of this demonstration, we will be looking at the highest end spec of the iMac Pro, which is the product that most working professionals look to purchase. The highest end specification, which is currently the most powerful iMac Pro on the market, is priced at a whopping $13,350. This spec is suitable for editing 8K footage while streaming, running VMs or engaging in something that is being known as supertasking, wherein the user engages in multiple compute-heavy tasks at the same time. This is owing to its 18-core, 36-thread processor straight from Intel’s Xeon lineup, which is usually reserved for enterprise customers. Along with this, the top end specification also comes with 128GB of (relatively) high-speed RAM, and an AMD Radeon Vega 64 card with 16GB of memory for GPU-intensive tasks. The computer also comes with a 4GB SSD for fast booting and loading. There are also various software tweaks and optimizations that can be made by Apple due to the close integration of their OS with the components inside. There is also the matter of personal preference between users that wish to use the Mac-exclusive Final Cut Pro or Logic Pro X software for video and audio editing purposes. There is also the question of additional hardware that the user has is compatible with Mac or Windows, with multiple companies providing different products for the two OSs. This setup, along with MacOS’ great legacy support and Apple’s customer care, assures professionals with a computer they can depend on for large amounts of compute power for a long amount of time. Moreover, MacOS also comes usable out of the box, requiring the user to simply plug in power and be ready for work. The iMac Pro also comes with creature comforts such as an industrial design, a compact footprint and Thunderbolt ports for ultimate connectivity. It also boasts of one of the best displays in the business, with the iMac Pro’s Retina 5K display outdoing most competition and its previous iterations. PC: The Battlegrounds Of Innovation And Blue Screens Of Death While most cutting-edge innovation in the computing space comes in the PC market owing to its open nature and penchant for standardization, it is often disguised in the form of ‘bleeding-edge’. The ‘bleeding’ portion of the term comes from the money bleeding from the wallets of the users who wish to stay at the forefront of innovation. However, the PC platform offers a choice that is infinitely more varied than that of the Mac lineup, along with customizability in terms of aesthetics and configurations. However, one area where PC professionals win over the iMac Pro is pricing. While the iMac Pro will easily set users back $10,000+, a PC built with specs that are more powerful than the iMac will come in at $8,500. This improves on the iMac in multiple ways, including a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper processor, faster RAM, a 2TB SSD paired with a 12TB HDD, and a cutting edge, Nvidia Titan RTX GPU with a whopping 24GB of memory. After including the OS, case, peripherals and a 4K monitor, the price tag still rests below that of the top-end iMac Pro while handily beating it in performance. However, this PC comes with the additional time cost of setting it up with the OS, not to mention the time is taken to assemble it. Even if the user outsources this process by requesting it from a system builder such as Newegg, Windows requires users to ‘get their hands dirty’ more than MacOS does. While the latter just works, Windows requires drivers to be set up, along with personal troubleshooting owing to the lack of dedicated customer support. Windows, in comparison to Mac, has a lot more choices for software, especially in the editing field. The OS also has deeper functionality through the registry and a back catalogue of multiple issues and fixes. In the end, however, the choice comes down to the user. Windows offers better value for money and choice but requires users to have a level of technical know-how to operate and maintain it. Apple’s offerings just work out of the box, but command a high premium for entry into their walled garden, and provide a lower power for higher prices.
For many years, computing enthusiasts have argued over which offering is better: Apple’s Mac computers, or trusty ol’ Windows by Microsoft, which will run on basically anything. This argument hasn’t come to a conclusion for many years, shifting tune with the change of the market itself. However, times today present a very different environment for […]
For many years, computing enthusiasts have argued over which offering is better: Apple’s Mac computers, or trusty ol' Windows by Microsoft, which will run on basically anything. This argument hasn't come to a conclusion for many years, shifting tune with the change of the market itself. However, times today present a very different environment for Apple and Microsoft users.
["Apple", "audio mining software", "macbook", "Microsoft"]
["Go", "Microsoft", "AI", "programming_languages:R", "Apple", "innovation", "programming_languages:Go", "ViT", "Rust", "audio mining software", "R", "programming_languages:Rust", "macbook"]
["AI", "R", "Go", "Rust", "ViT", "innovation", "programming_languages:R", "programming_languages:Go", "programming_languages:Rust"]
I am an AI enthusiast and love keeping up with the latest events in the space. I love video games and pizza.