Gartner’s Hype Cycle is a Waste of Time
Recently, Gartner released another version of its Hype Cycle — and it’s nothing new. Each year, the research and advisory firm creates over 100 of these cycles across various fields. However, it looks like the hype cycle is going through its own Trough of Disillusionment. Each emerging technology is different and takes its own separate path to get adopted among the masses. Take ChatGPT for instance. It clearly broke the AI Hype Cycle within three months of the launch. According to Gartner, it was supposed to take a minimum of two years to reach the ‘plateau’. This new report seems to be no different. There is no doubt that over the years, the report has helped business leaders and its clients get a fair idea of how much time a new emergent technology will take to eventually reach the ‘Plateau of Productivity’. In simpler terms, this is when the technology sees widespread adoption and achieves its full potential. Missing the gold To start with, one cannot simply ignore that almost every single truly transformative technology wasn’t ever tracked by Gartner including the WiFi, GPS chips, the App Store, Web2.0, API’s etc. It’s quite remarkable how many significant technologies from the past two decades weren’t recognised early or never made it to a Hype Cycle. In the world of technology, things that may appear minor or short-lived often end up forming the basis for the next generation of business and consumer tools. A closer look at Gartner’s different graph versions over the years shows that certain technologies vanish in later editions, seemingly replaced by new ones. For example, “smartphone” made an appearance on the ‘Slope of Enlightenment’ in 2006, without a clear journey through the ‘Peak of Inflated Expectations’. The story doesn’t stop there. The Gartner Hype Cycle missed out on notable technologies like NoSQL, which started gaining traction in the mid-2000s, giving us innovations like MongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, and Couchbase. Considering this, it would not be wrong to say that the level of hype Gartner and its associates are trying to generate for a technology, represents the extent to which their consultants are pushing clients towards certain tech, while ignoring the real advancements. Times When the Hype Cycle Got it Wrong In 2022, Gartner on Zero Knowledge Proof predicted that the technology will take 5 to 10 years for mainstream adoption. However, Worldcoin, which was recently launched based on ZKP, saw major adoption around the world. According to the recent reports, Worldcoin secured more than 9,500 Argentine users within a day in August. As of now, more than 2 million people around the world from Chile to Indonesia to Kenya have sat in front of Worldcoin orbs to have their irises scanned. The number is clearly higher than the cycle expected. Similarly, for Code generation, a period of five to ten years was predicted. But today, we have a plethora of options to choose from for code generation, such as Code Llama, Code Whisper, Codex and Codey. Clearly, Gartner got it wrong. Furthermore, In 2022, Gartner predicted that the Metaverse would need more than 10 years to realise its full potential. Yet, earlier this year, there was a growing sentiment that the Metaverse is dead. However, in the case of Metaverse, it would be interesting to observe if it is currently in its ‘Trough of Disillusionment’ phase or if it is really dead. Hype Cycle is not Science Many technologies simply fade away with time or die. According to Michael Mullany, an additional 20% of all technologies that were tracked for multiple years on the Hype Cycle became obsolete before reaching any kind of mainstream success. The Gartner Hype Cycle is not science, but Gartner presents it as an established natural law. Expressing similar sentiments, a user on Hacker News wrote, “Why do people think the Gartner Hype Cycle is a law of Physics?” when in fact, the Hype Cycle lacks empirical backing and fails to consider technologies that deviate from its prescribed path. Well, it may be useful to investors in some cases as it gives them an estimate of the time period in which a tech will mature, but blindly following it without taking into consideration other factors and sources of information can lead to wrong decisions, because Gartner can conveniently change the hype next year to fix their mistakes.
The Gartner Hype Cycle is not science, but Gartner presents it as an established law
Gartner released another version of its Hype Cycle, and it's nothing new - a lot of missing technologies and half-baked predictions
["gartner", "Gartner hype cycle"]
["Go", "ChatGPT", "API", "AI", "MongoDB", "R", "GPT", "ViT", "SQL", "gartner", "Gartner hype cycle", "Redis"]
["AI", "ChatGPT", "Redis", "MongoDB", "R", "SQL", "Go", "API", "GPT", "ViT"]
Siddharth is a media graduate who loves to explore tech through journalism and putting forward ideas worth pondering about in the era of artificial intelligence.